Filed: Apr. 27, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7928 KEITH LEMONT SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. KIMBER EXTINE, Deputy Sheriff of York County, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-727-2) Submitted: April 16, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Le
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7928 KEITH LEMONT SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. KIMBER EXTINE, Deputy Sheriff of York County, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-727-2) Submitted: April 16, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Lem..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7928 KEITH LEMONT SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. KIMBER EXTINE, Deputy Sheriff of York County, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-03-727-2) Submitted: April 16, 2004 Decided: April 27, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Lemont Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Keith Lemont Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Extine, No. CA-03-727-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 27, 2003 & entered Oct. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
