Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chafin v. State Farm Fire, 04-1033 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1033 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jun. 02, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1033 PATRICIA S. CHAFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-153-2) Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 2, 2004 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1033 PATRICIA S. CHAFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-153-2) Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 2, 2004 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Hobbs, LAW OFFICE OF MARK HOBBS, Chapmanville, West Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffery S. Burgess, Charles S. Piccirillo, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, P.L.L.C., Madison, West Virginia, Kelly R. Charnock, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Patricia S. Chafin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chafin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., No. CA-03-153-2 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer