Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Christian v. So & Kim Inc, 04-1064 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1064 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1064 TANJA J. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SO & KIM, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Chesapeake Bay Seafood House, Defendant - Appellee, and HUI YOUNG SO, in his individual capacity; MELODY COE, in her individual capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-505-3) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1064 TANJA J. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SO & KIM, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Chesapeake Bay Seafood House, Defendant - Appellee, and HUI YOUNG SO, in his individual capacity; MELODY COE, in her individual capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-505-3) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owaiian M. Jones, Corey L. Poindexter, LAW OFFICES OF OWAIIAN M. JONES, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Tanja J. Christian appeals the magistrate judge’s order* dismissing her employment discrimination complaint, filed on June 26, 2004, as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Christian v. So & Kim, Inc., No. CA-03-505-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer