Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McGilton v. US Xpress Enterprises, 04-1415 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1415 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 29, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1415 BRYAN CHAD MCGILTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-117-5) Submitted: October 20, 2004 Decided: October 29, 2004 Before WIDENER an
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1415 BRYAN CHAD MCGILTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-117-5) Submitted: October 20, 2004 Decided: October 29, 2004 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew M. Price, SMITH, PRICE, PANGBURN, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Avrum Levicoff, Ryan J. King, BROWN & LEVICOFF, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Charles S. Cassis, Julie C. Foster, FROST, BROWN, TODD, L.L.C., Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bryan Chad McGilton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Appellees in McGilton’s tort action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McGilton v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., No. CA-02- 117-5 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer