Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs, 04-1487 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1487 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1487 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, - LDA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant versus VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. No. 04-1488 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, - LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VETERAN AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1487 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, ------------------------------ LDA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant versus VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. No. 04-1488 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, ------------------------------ LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VETERAN AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-42-2; CA-03-913-2; BK-02-72575-DHA; APN-03-7138) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa Annette Broadnax, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Gregory David Stefan, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing an appeal from the bankruptcy court for failing to designate the record, as required by Fed. Bankr. R. 8006, and denying her motion for reconsideration and (2) dismissing as untimely another appeal from a bankruptcy court order. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs, Nos. CA-04- 42-2; CA-03-913-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9, 2004 & entered Mar. 10, 2004; Apr. 1, 2004; filed Apr. 2, 2004 & entered Apr. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer