Filed: Oct. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1723 KAMIL A. MESAYS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-1570-RDB) Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1723 KAMIL A. MESAYS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-1570-RDB) Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1723 KAMIL A. MESAYS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-1570-RDB) Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kamil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No. CA-04-1570-RDB (D. Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
