Filed: Dec. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1972 TUCSON W. JONES; YVONNE C. JONES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SOUTHCORR, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-499-1) Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tucson W. Jones,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1972 TUCSON W. JONES; YVONNE C. JONES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SOUTHCORR, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-499-1) Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tucson W. Jones, Y..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1972 TUCSON W. JONES; YVONNE C. JONES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SOUTHCORR, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-499-1) Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tucson W. Jones, Yvonne C. Jones, Appellants Pro Se. Hamlin Landis Wade, Jr., Melissa Megan Kidd, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PPLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tucson W. Jones and Yvonne C. Jones appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant in this Title VII action alleging race discrimination in employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Southcorr, LLC, No. CA-03-499-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 8, 2004; entered July 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -