Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mattis v. US Dept of Justice, 04-2009 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-2009 Visitors: 40
Filed: Nov. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2009 GARY KEVIN MATTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; KIMBERLY J. DELGRECO; TONIA L. LEWIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-03-10-3) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Cir
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2009 GARY KEVIN MATTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; KIMBERLY J. DELGRECO; TONIA L. LEWIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-03-10-3) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Kevin Mattis, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gary Kevin Mattis appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mattis v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-03-10-3 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2003; Apr. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer