Filed: Dec. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2033 ROSALIE T. JOHNSON, Evang., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF, Department and Detention Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-2846-2-23AJ) Submitted: November 17, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2033 ROSALIE T. JOHNSON, Evang., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF, Department and Detention Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-2846-2-23AJ) Submitted: November 17, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2033 ROSALIE T. JOHNSON, Evang., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF, Department and Detention Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-2846-2-23AJ) Submitted: November 17, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosalie T. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Rosalie T. Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Berkeley County Sheriff, No. CA-03-2846-2-23AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
