Filed: Aug. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6973 DAVID MCKEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; LIEUTENANT DEWALDS; WARDEN ZENK; BITTEN BENDER, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1025) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6973 DAVID MCKEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; LIEUTENANT DEWALDS; WARDEN ZENK; BITTEN BENDER, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1025) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6973 DAVID MCKEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; LIEUTENANT DEWALDS; WARDEN ZENK; BITTEN BENDER, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1025) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David McKee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: David McKee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McKee v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-1025 (E.D. Va. May 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
