Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carwile v. Mrs. Compton, 04-7176 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-7176 Visitors: 44
Filed: Oct. 15, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7176 DUSTIN L. CARWILE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MRS. COMPTON, Personal Property Officer; CAPTAIN JANEWAY; STAN K. YOUNG, Warden, Wallens Ridge; GENE JOHNSON, Deputy Director of Virginia Prisons; VINCE BOBROSKY; JANICE T. DOW; LOUIS B. CEI; JAMES M. SISK; PRU STASIKEWICH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7176 DUSTIN L. CARWILE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MRS. COMPTON, Personal Property Officer; CAPTAIN JANEWAY; STAN K. YOUNG, Warden, Wallens Ridge; GENE JOHNSON, Deputy Director of Virginia Prisons; VINCE BOBROSKY; JANICE T. DOW; LOUIS B. CEI; JAMES M. SISK; PRU STASIKEWICH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-154-2) Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 15, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dustin L. Carwile, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Foster Barr, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dustin L. Carwile appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carwile v. Compton, No. CA-03-154-2 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer