Filed: Mar. 16, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1797 TYRONE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BEAR ISLAND PAPER, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and BOBBY JACKSON; MIKE POWELL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-03-989-3) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005 Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1797 TYRONE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BEAR ISLAND PAPER, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and BOBBY JACKSON; MIKE POWELL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-03-989-3) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005 Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1797 TYRONE CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BEAR ISLAND PAPER, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and BOBBY JACKSON; MIKE POWELL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-03-989-3) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005 Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick H. Marsh, HILL, TUCKER, & MARSH, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. D. Eugene Webb, Jr., Mary Leslie Parpart, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone Carter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Bear Island Paper, LLC, No. CA-03-989-3 (E.D. Va. May 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
