Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anderson v. YMCA South Hampton, 04-1864 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1864 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 15, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1864 ANITA G. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus YOUNG MEN’S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH HAMPTON ROADS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-442) Submitted: March 9, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005 Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1864 ANITA G. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus YOUNG MEN’S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH HAMPTON ROADS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-442) Submitted: March 9, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005 Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas F. Hennessy, III, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Timothy M. Richardson, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anita G. Anderson appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Young Men’s Christian Association of South Hampton Roads (YMCA) on her claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-5 (West 2003). Anderson alleges that the YMCA discriminated against her on account of her gender and in retaliation against her for engaging in activity protected by federal employment discrimination laws when it failed to rehire her in 2002. Having reviewed the joint appendix and the parties’ briefs, we are persuaded that the district court reached the correct result. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Young Men’s Christian Ass’n of South Hampton Roads, Inc., No. 2:03-cv-442 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2004). AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer