Filed: Apr. 18, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1880 DONALD T. MURRAY; BRIAN J. HISSAM, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SKY BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-242-5) Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: April 18, 2005 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1880 DONALD T. MURRAY; BRIAN J. HISSAM, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SKY BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-242-5) Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: April 18, 2005 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1880
DONALD T. MURRAY; BRIAN J. HISSAM,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
SKY BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-242-5)
Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: April 18, 2005
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph L. Ludovici, ARONSON, FINEMAN & DAVIS CO., LPA, East
Liverpool, Ohio, for Appellants. Paul J. Walsh, III, Adam M.
Barnes, WALSH, COLLIS & BLACKMER, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order enforcing a
settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and do not find that the district court abused its
discretion by enforcing the agreement. See Young v. FDIC,
103 F.3d
1180, 1194 (4th Cir. 1997) (stating review standard); DeVane v.
Kennedy,
519 S.E.2d 622, 630 (W. Va. 1999) (stating review standard
under West Virginia law). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Murray v. Sky Bank, No. CA-03-242-5
(N.D.W. Va. June 14, 2004). We grant the motion to submit the case
on briefs because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -