Filed: Mar. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2360 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CG6 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus POLICE DEPARTMENT, Town of Berryville, Virginia; D. ELDEN NESSELRODT; KEITH DALTON; TOWN OF BERRYVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-14-5-GEC) Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2360 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CG6 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus POLICE DEPARTMENT, Town of Berryville, Virginia; D. ELDEN NESSELRODT; KEITH DALTON; TOWN OF BERRYVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-14-5-GEC) Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2360 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CG6 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus POLICE DEPARTMENT, Town of Berryville, Virginia; D. ELDEN NESSELRODT; KEITH DALTON; TOWN OF BERRYVILLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-14-5-GEC) Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 14, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Keith Brake, KEELER OBENSHAIN, P.C., Harrisonburg, Virginia; Edward Harrison Grove, III, BRAULT, PALMER, GROVER, WHITE & STEINHILBER, L.L.P., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Liggins v. Police Dep’t, CA-04-14-5-GEC (W.D. Va., filed Sept. 30, 2004; entered Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -