Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shabazz v. Braxton, 04-7606 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-7606 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 06, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7606 HASSAN SHABAZZ, a/k/a R. Sydnor; TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus D. A. BRAXTON, Warden; J. ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-39-7) Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: April 6, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and KIN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7606 HASSAN SHABAZZ, a/k/a R. Sydnor; TYRONE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus D. A. BRAXTON, Warden; J. ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-39-7) Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: April 6, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hassan Shabazz and Tyrone L. Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Hassan Shabazz and Tyrone L. Johnson appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shabazz v. Braxton, No. CA-03-39-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2004). We grant Shabazz’s motion to amend his informal brief filed in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer