In Re: Menichino v., 04-7858 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 04-7858
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7858 IN RE: ANDREW MENICHINO, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-1476) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Menichino, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andrew Menichino petitions for writ of mandamu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7858 IN RE: ANDREW MENICHINO, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-1476) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Menichino, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andrew Menichino petitions for writ of mandamus..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7858 IN RE: ANDREW MENICHINO, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-1476) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Menichino, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andrew Menichino petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on a petition that he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source: CourtListener
