Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Oladokun v. United States, 04-7983 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-7983 Visitors: 29
Filed: May 05, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7983 OLADAYO OLADOKUN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1399-AW) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7983 OLADAYO OLADOKUN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1399-AW) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oladayo Oladokun, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Jane Frances Nathan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Oladayo Oladokun seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Oladokun v. United States, No. CA-04-1399- AW (D. Md. filed Nov. 18, 2004 & entered Nov. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer