Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Baten v. SC Dept of Juvenile Justice, 05-1052 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1052 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 08, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1052 ALEXANDRA BATEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-980-3-10BD) Submitted: June 17, 2005 Decided: July 8, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chalmers C. Jo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1052 ALEXANDRA BATEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Bristow Marchant, Magistrate Judge. (CA-01-980-3-10BD) Submitted: June 17, 2005 Decided: July 8, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Kathryn Thomas, Christina M. Summer, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Alexandra Baten appeals the magistrate judge’s* order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Baten v. South Carolina Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. CA-01-980-3-10BD (D.S.C. Dec. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer