Filed: Aug. 19, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1057 BYRON C. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORMAN Y. MANETA, Secretary of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-04-122-1) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1057 BYRON C. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORMAN Y. MANETA, Secretary of Transportation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-04-122-1) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1057
BYRON C. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORMAN Y. MANETA, Secretary of Transportation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-04-122-1)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Byron C. Brown appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint in which he alleged discrimination in his
employment. Upon review of the record and the district court’s
order, we affirm the dismissal of Brown’s action as untimely filed.
See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(f)(1), -16(c) (2000); Harvey v. City of
New Bern Police Dep’t,
813 F.2d 652, 654 (4th Cir. 1987) (upholding
dismissal of complaint filed one day late); see also Irwin v. Dep’t
of Veterans Affairs,
498 U.S. 89, 96 (1990) (discussing limitations
on equitable tolling). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -