Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Schuele v. Stratia Group Inc, 05-1274 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1274 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 29, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1274 AMY SCHUELE; DOUGLAS SCHUELE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus STRATIA GROUP, INCORPORATED; GREG BARRETT, Defendants - Appellees, and STRATIA EDUCATION, LLC; DANIEL E. HAUG; CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, INCORPORATED, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 2970-AMD)
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1274 AMY SCHUELE; DOUGLAS SCHUELE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus STRATIA GROUP, INCORPORATED; GREG BARRETT, Defendants - Appellees, and STRATIA EDUCATION, LLC; DANIEL E. HAUG; CAPITAL RESOURCE GROUP, INCORPORATED, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 2970-AMD) Submitted: November 4, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark E. Herman, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Amy Schuele and Douglas Schuele appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their complaint without prejudice based on failure to serve process and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Schuele v. Stratia Group, Inc., No. CA-04- 2970-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer