Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Simpson v. Coleman, 05-1426 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1426 Visitors: 28
Filed: Aug. 30, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1426 IN RE: MONICA LYNN COLEMAN, Debtor, - LORI S. SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MONICA LYNN COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-786-BEL; BK-99-5609; BK-99-56239) Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: August 30, 2005 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1426 IN RE: MONICA LYNN COLEMAN, Debtor, ----------------------------- LORI S. SIMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MONICA LYNN COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-786-BEL; BK-99-5609; BK-99-56239) Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: August 30, 2005 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Monica Lynn Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Thomas Fletcher, Jr., Kevin Gerald Hroblak, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Monica Lynn Coleman appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the trustee and denying her a discharge in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Simpson v. Coleman, Nos. CA-04-786-BEL; BK-99-5609; BK-99-56239 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer