Filed: Dec. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1719 JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF JACKSON; J. M. HESS; DENNIS RUSHTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA- 04-684-1-RBH) Submitted: November 28, 2005 Decided: December 9, 2005 Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished pe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1719 JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF JACKSON; J. M. HESS; DENNIS RUSHTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA- 04-684-1-RBH) Submitted: November 28, 2005 Decided: December 9, 2005 Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1719 JOSEPH C. SUN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF JACKSON; J. M. HESS; DENNIS RUSHTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA- 04-684-1-RBH) Submitted: November 28, 2005 Decided: December 9, 2005 Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, VINTON D. LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joseph C. Sun appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sun v. Town of Jackson, No. CA-04-684-1-RBH (D.S.C. June 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
