Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

White-Battle v. Democratic Party VA, 05-1932 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1932 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1932 SHERRY WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; NORFOLK CITY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE; GEORGE SCHAEFER; NORFOLK ELECTORAL BOARD, Defendants - Appellees, - ELISA LONG, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; EILEEN M. ADDISON, Movants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-897-2)
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1932 SHERRY WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; NORFOLK CITY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE; GEORGE SCHAEFER; NORFOLK ELECTORAL BOARD, Defendants - Appellees, -------------------------------------------------- ELISA LONG, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; EILEEN M. ADDISON, Movants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-897-2) Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherry White-Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Edward Heretick, FIRST VIRGINIA BANK BUILDING, Portsmouth, Virginia; Robert Bryan Rigney, A. Christopher Zaleski, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia, No. CA-03-897-2 (E.D. Va. July 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer