Filed: Apr. 21, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6308 TYRELL DAVRON ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LISA HARDY; CARIE BLAND; THE BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-4071-AMD) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Cir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6308 TYRELL DAVRON ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LISA HARDY; CARIE BLAND; THE BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-4071-AMD) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6308 TYRELL DAVRON ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LISA HARDY; CARIE BLAND; THE BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-4071-AMD) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrell Davron Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tyrell Davron Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Maryland, No. CA-04-4071-AMD (D. Md. filed Jan. 28, 2005 & entered Jan. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
