Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wynn v. Corr Officer Mundo, 05-6359 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6359 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 01, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6359 MARK ALLEN WYNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MUNDO; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ALBEMARLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HONBARRIER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRUTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CAVINESS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER EUDY; SERGEANT CHESTNUT; SERGEANT PORTER; LIEUTENANT FLETCHER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District C
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6359 MARK ALLEN WYNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MUNDO; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ALBEMARLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HONBARRIER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRUTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CAVINESS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER EUDY; SERGEANT CHESTNUT; SERGEANT PORTER; LIEUTENANT FLETCHER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District to North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-365-FWB) Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 1, 2005 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Allen Wynn, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark Allen Wynn appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wynn v. Correctional Officer Mundo, No. CA-04-365-FWB (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Wynn’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer