Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wanguhu v. Gonzales, 05-1877 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1877 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1877 HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-031) Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Atto
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1877 HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-031) Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Wanguhu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu, No. A79-513-031 (B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer