Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Reaves v. Town of Fair Bluff, 05-1911 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1911 Visitors: 37
Filed: Feb. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1911 FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF FAIR BLUFF; J. B. EVANS, individually and as Mayor of the Town of Fair Bluff; WILLARD D. SMALL; CARL W. MEARES, JR.; BILLY HAMMOND; SELENA GRAHAM; JAMES H. MEARES, JR., individually and as Commissioner; LEE LEGGETT, individually and as Chief of the Town of Fair Bluff Police Department; B. T. HODGE, individually and in his official capacity; TOWN OF FAI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1911 FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TOWN OF FAIR BLUFF; J. B. EVANS, individually and as Mayor of the Town of Fair Bluff; WILLARD D. SMALL; CARL W. MEARES, JR.; BILLY HAMMOND; SELENA GRAHAM; JAMES H. MEARES, JR., individually and as Commissioner; LEE LEGGETT, individually and as Chief of the Town of Fair Bluff Police Department; B. T. HODGE, individually and in his official capacity; TOWN OF FAIR BLUFF POLICE DEPARTMENT; FOWLER'S AUTO SALES 24 HOUR TOWING SERVICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-103-7-F) Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reverend Franklin C. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Edwin Edes, Clay Allen Collier, CROSSLEY, MCINTOSH, PRIOR & COLLIER, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Franklin C. Reaves appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3) (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reaves v. Town of Fair Bluff, No. CA-03-103-7-F (E.D.N.C. May 12 and July 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer