Filed: Mar. 16, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2027 MARTHA HUSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-1452) Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: March 16, 2006 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martha Huser, Appellant Pro
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2027 MARTHA HUSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-1452) Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: March 16, 2006 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martha Huser, Appellant Pro ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2027 MARTHA HUSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-04-1452) Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: March 16, 2006 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martha Huser, Appellant Pro Se. Charles G. Aschmann, Jr., ASCHMANN & ASCHMANN, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No. CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005; filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
