Filed: May 08, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2038 SOFIA HASSEN ABUBUKER, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-203-694) Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006 Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rochelle A. Fortier Nwadibia, PRIVITERA & NWADIBIA, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2038 SOFIA HASSEN ABUBUKER, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-203-694) Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006 Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rochelle A. Fortier Nwadibia, PRIVITERA & NWADIBIA, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2038
SOFIA HASSEN ABUBUKER,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A97-203-694)
Submitted: April 19, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rochelle A. Fortier Nwadibia, PRIVITERA & NWADIBIA, San Francisco,
California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, Carol Federighi, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sofia Hassen Abubuker, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of
relief. Our review discloses that the petition for review was
filed out of time. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(b)(1) (West 2005)
(establishing thirty-day time frame for filing petition for
review).
We accordingly dismiss the petition for review for lack
of jurisdiction. See Stone v. INS,
514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -