Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hubbard v. Elliott Inc, 05-2158 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-2158 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2158 VIRGIE B. HUBBARD; DENNIS G. HUBBARD; DENNIS G. HUBBARD, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ELLIOTT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-589) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2158 VIRGIE B. HUBBARD; DENNIS G. HUBBARD; DENNIS G. HUBBARD, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus ELLIOTT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-589) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Virgie B. Hubbard, Dennis G. Hubbard, and Dennis G. Hubbard, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. John Headley Shott, Sr., SHOTT, GURGANUS & WILLIAMSON, Bluefield, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Virgie B. Hubbard, Dennis G. Hubbard, and Dennis G. Hubbard, Jr., appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge dismissing their civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hubbard v. Elliott, Inc., No. CA-04-589 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer