Filed: Aug. 03, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2340 DARRYL G. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-504-1) Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Hutchings, Jr., SAUNDERS
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2340 DARRYL G. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-504-1) Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Hutchings, Jr., SAUNDERS ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2340 DARRYL G. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-05-504-1) Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William E. Hutchings, Jr., SAUNDERS & SCHMIELER, P.C., Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. David Drummey, Assistant Attorney General, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Darryl G. Davis appeals the district court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. George Mason Univ., No. CA-05-504-1 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2005 & entered Oct. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -