Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Taylor v. State of Georgia, 05-597 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-597 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 04, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-597 WARREN A. TAYLOR, Petitioner, versus STATE OF GEORGIA, et al.; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, at Augusta. Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-36-DHB) Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition d
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-597 WARREN A. TAYLOR, Petitioner, versus STATE OF GEORGIA, et al.; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, at Augusta. Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-36-DHB) Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren A. Taylor, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Warren A. Taylor petitions under Fed. R. App. P. 5 for permission to appeal the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia denying Taylor’s motion for reconsideration of its earlier order denying a change of venue in Taylor’s civil action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Because we lack jurisdiction to review orders of the Georgia district court, see 28 U.S.C. § 1294 (2000), we deny Taylor’s pending motions and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer