Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Davis v. Brewster, 05-7400 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-7400 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 16, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7400 GERALD DEAN DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAULA A. BREWSTER; JOYCE L. HUFF; EDGAR V. GUTHRO; TONY FISHER, Chief, Spartanburg Public Safety Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA- 04-1711-3-HFF) Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: February 16, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7400 GERALD DEAN DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAULA A. BREWSTER; JOYCE L. HUFF; EDGAR V. GUTHRO; TONY FISHER, Chief, Spartanburg Public Safety Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA- 04-1711-3-HFF) Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: February 16, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Dean Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS & GIVENS, L.L.P., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gerald Dean Davis, Jr. appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Davis’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Brewster, No. CA-04- 1711-3-HFF (D.S.C. Aug. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer