Filed: Apr. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7467 MARC S. CASON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M.D.P.S.C.S.; DIVISION OF CORRECTION; TERISITA JACKSON, CMSII; R. THOMAS, CO II; R. WEEKS, CO II; EMSA MEDICAL SERVICES; BARBARA PEACE, RN; STEVE REYNOLDS, RN; DAPHNE GREEN, RN; KELLY, Nurse Practitioner, and any other medical staff responsible for the mistreatment and negligence of the plaintiff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7467 MARC S. CASON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M.D.P.S.C.S.; DIVISION OF CORRECTION; TERISITA JACKSON, CMSII; R. THOMAS, CO II; R. WEEKS, CO II; EMSA MEDICAL SERVICES; BARBARA PEACE, RN; STEVE REYNOLDS, RN; DAPHNE GREEN, RN; KELLY, Nurse Practitioner, and any other medical staff responsible for the mistreatment and negligence of the plaintiff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for t..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7467 MARC S. CASON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M.D.P.S.C.S.; DIVISION OF CORRECTION; TERISITA JACKSON, CMSII; R. THOMAS, CO II; R. WEEKS, CO II; EMSA MEDICAL SERVICES; BARBARA PEACE, RN; STEVE REYNOLDS, RN; DAPHNE GREEN, RN; KELLY, Nurse Practitioner, and any other medical staff responsible for the mistreatment and negligence of the plaintiff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 05-2400-CCB) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marc S. Cason, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Marc S. Cason, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cason v. MDPSCS, No. CA-05-2400-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -