Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff, 05-7603 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-7603 Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 03, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7603 CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; J. W. BOLES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-440-1) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curia
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7603 CHARLES FRANKLIN HARGETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; J. W. BOLES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-440-1) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Allan R. Gitter, Bradley Owen Wood, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-03- 440-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer