Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hudgins, 06-6298 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6298 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jul. 26, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6298 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ADRIAN MAURICE HUDGINS, a/k/a Dee, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:94-cr-00133-sgw) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6298 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ADRIAN MAURICE HUDGINS, a/k/a Dee, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:94-cr-00133-sgw) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adrian Maurice Hudgins, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Adrian Maurice Hudgins appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to vacate and reimpose judgment,” which the court construed as a motion to reopen the time for filing an appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hudgins, No. 7:94-cr-00133-sgw (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer