Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Albritton v. Williams, 06-6411 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6411 Visitors: 56
Filed: Sep. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6411 DEVINCHE ALBRITTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS S. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; EDWARD C. RONAN, Master Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office, Defendants - Appellees, and PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff; VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CORPORAL KNOX, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; CORPORAL RANDOLPH, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; PAMELLA K. BUSSE, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office;
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6411 DEVINCHE ALBRITTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS S. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; EDWARD C. RONAN, Master Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office, Defendants - Appellees, and PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff; VIRGINIA BEACH SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CORPORAL KNOX, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; CORPORAL RANDOLPH, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; PAMELLA K. BUSSE, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; ERIC M. CALHOUN, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; B. STROMER, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00344-JBF) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 6, 2006 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. DeVinche Albritton, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: DeVinche Albritton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Albritton v. Williams, No. 2:05-cv-00344-JBF (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006). We deny Albritton’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer