Filed: Oct. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6453 JERRY L. ADAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. M. JOHNSON, Health Service Director; H. J. PONTON, Warden; SAYED KAZI, Prison Physician; J. FIELDS, Director of Treatment Programs; G. HARRIS, Registered Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:04-cv-00641-HCM) Submitted: September 28, 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6453 JERRY L. ADAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus G. M. JOHNSON, Health Service Director; H. J. PONTON, Warden; SAYED KAZI, Prison Physician; J. FIELDS, Director of Treatment Programs; G. HARRIS, Registered Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:04-cv-00641-HCM) Submitted: September 28, 20..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6453
JERRY L. ADAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. M. JOHNSON, Health Service Director; H. J.
PONTON, Warden; SAYED KAZI, Prison Physician;
J. FIELDS, Director of Treatment Programs; G.
HARRIS, Registered Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:04-cv-00641-HCM)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 5, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Adams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint
for failing to submit three copies of the complaint or to file a
concise amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S.
541 (1949). The order Adams seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064,
1067 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -