Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Babb v. Drug Enforcement Admin, 06-1533 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1533 Visitors: 88
Filed: Jun. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1533 DAVID A. BABB, Reg. No. 88340-071, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:97-cv-01553-HMH) Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: June 28, 2007 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubli
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1533 DAVID A. BABB, Reg. No. 88340-071, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:97-cv-01553-HMH) Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: June 28, 2007 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian W. Shaughnessy, SHAUGHNESSY, VOLZER and GAGNER, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David A. Babb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to return seized money, and quieting title to the money in favor of the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Babb v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 6:97-cv-01553-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer