Filed: Jan. 29, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1701 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MORER LEE, Defendant - Appellant, and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALLEGANY COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:05-cv-02923-CCB) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circui
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1701 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MORER LEE, Defendant - Appellant, and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALLEGANY COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:05-cv-02923-CCB) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1701 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MORER LEE, Defendant - Appellant, and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALLEGANY COUNTY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:05-cv-02923-CCB) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 29, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Morer Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Scott Cohen, MICHAEL SCOTT COHEN, LLC, Cumberland, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Morer Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the civil action against him to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction. The district court’s remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
