Filed: Feb. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1891 GARY W. SAYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FMRS MENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (5:04-cv-00333) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary W.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1891 GARY W. SAYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FMRS MENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (5:04-cv-00333) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary W. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1891 GARY W. SAYRE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FMRS MENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (5:04-cv-00333) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 27, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary W. Sayre, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Dale Morrison, SCHUMACHER, FRANCIS & NELSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Gary W. Sayre appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief in his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc., No. 5:04-cv- 00333 (S.D.W. Va. July 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
