Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hubbard v. Commissioner, SSA, 06-2148 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-2148 Visitors: 43
Filed: Dec. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2148 JIMMIE HUBBARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cv-00029-jlk) Submitted: December 7, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2148 JIMMIE HUBBARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cv-00029-jlk) Submitted: December 7, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joel C. Cunningham, Jr., JOEL C. CUNNINGHAM, JR., P.C., Halifax, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, Sandra Romagnole, Special Assistant, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jimmie Hubbard appeals the district court’s order rejecting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Hubbard a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental social security income payments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hubbard v. Comm’r of Social Security, No. 4:05-cv-00029-jlk (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer