Filed: Apr. 02, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2184 LUKE ALLEN, State Bureau of Investigation, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALD SEWYER, Detective, Moore County Police Department; ELAINE TURBAVILLE, SBI Agent, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; TIM THOMPSON, Deputy Sheriff, Richmond County Sheriff’s Department; LINDA JAYNE STOWERS, Court Appointed Counsel; JOHN KEANE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2184 LUKE ALLEN, State Bureau of Investigation, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALD SEWYER, Detective, Moore County Police Department; ELAINE TURBAVILLE, SBI Agent, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; TIM THOMPSON, Deputy Sheriff, Richmond County Sheriff’s Department; LINDA JAYNE STOWERS, Court Appointed Counsel; JOHN KEANE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2184
LUKE ALLEN, State Bureau of Investigation,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GERALD SEWYER, Detective, Moore County Police
Department; ELAINE TURBAVILLE, SBI Agent,
North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation;
TIM THOMPSON, Deputy Sheriff, Richmond County
Sheriff’s Department; LINDA JAYNE STOWERS,
Court Appointed Counsel; JOHN KEANE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00396-JAB)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luke Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luke Allen appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that Allen’s action
is barred by the three-year statute of limitations applicable to
prisoner civil rights claims arising in North Carolina. See N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 1-52(5) (LexisNexis 2005); Brooks v. City of Winston-
Salem,
85 F.3d 178, 181 (4th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -