Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McLaughlin v. Principi, 06-2283 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-2283 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2283 BRUCE M. MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Department of Veterans Affairs; JAMES D. SHELTON, Supervisor; TED IRBY, Team Coach; JERRY IRELAND, HRM; TANYA B. BURTON, Staff Attorney; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2283 BRUCE M. MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Department of Veterans Affairs; JAMES D. SHELTON, Supervisor; TED IRBY, Team Coach; JERRY IRELAND, HRM; TANYA B. BURTON, Staff Attorney; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-00203-WLO-WWD) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce M. McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bruce M. McLaughlin appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal of McLaughlin’s action alleging employment discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and ancillary claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLaughlin v. Principi, No. 1:05-cv-00203-WLO- WWD (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer