Filed: Jun. 19, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2335 BRYAN O’NEAL BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF; JOHN DOE DEPUTY SHERIFF; LIEUTENANT WELDON BULLOCK, Defendants - Appellees, and SERGEANT STERLIN WALKER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00506-BR) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, an
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2335 BRYAN O’NEAL BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF; JOHN DOE DEPUTY SHERIFF; LIEUTENANT WELDON BULLOCK, Defendants - Appellees, and SERGEANT STERLIN WALKER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00506-BR) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2335 BRYAN O’NEAL BENSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF; JOHN DOE DEPUTY SHERIFF; LIEUTENANT WELDON BULLOCK, Defendants - Appellees, and SERGEANT STERLIN WALKER, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00506-BR) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 19, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan O’Neal Benson, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bryan O’Neal Benson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Benson v. Vance County Sheriff, No. 5:05-cv-00506-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -