Filed: Jan. 22, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM RAYMOND TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Raymon
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM RAYMOND TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Raymond..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM RAYMOND TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Raymond Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Raymond Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00368-REP-AL (E.D. Va. June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
