Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. US Attorney's Office, 06-7320 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7320 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7320 JOHNNY M. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Washington, D.C., Individually and in their official capacities; JEAN B. HUDSON, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7320 JOHNNY M. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Washington, D.C., Individually and in their official capacities; JEAN B. HUDSON, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00582-CMH) Submitted: December 20, 2006 Decided: January 9, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny M. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States Attorney’s Office, No. 1:06-cv-00582-CMH (E.D. Va., filed July 10, 2006; entered July 11, 2006). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.* DISMISSED * The district court incorrectly identified Brown as a Virginia state prisoner. Brown is a federal prisoner who must challenge his conviction and sentence in a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The district court is directed to issue an amended order reflecting these corrections. - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer