Filed: Jan. 23, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7396 ROBERTO BAUTISTA RIVAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, as the governing body of Rivers Correctional Institution; GEORGE SNYDER, Warden; JEANNE KEEL, Prison Hospital Administrator; PENNY BROWN, Doctor; GADDY LASSITER, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Magistrate Judge. (5:06-ct
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7396 ROBERTO BAUTISTA RIVAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, as the governing body of Rivers Correctional Institution; GEORGE SNYDER, Warden; JEANNE KEEL, Prison Hospital Administrator; PENNY BROWN, Doctor; GADDY LASSITER, Dr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Magistrate Judge. (5:06-ct-..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7396
ROBERTO BAUTISTA RIVAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, as the governing
body of Rivers Correctional Institution;
GEORGE SNYDER, Warden; JEANNE KEEL, Prison
Hospital Administrator; PENNY BROWN, Doctor;
GADDY LASSITER, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Magistrate Judge. (5:06-ct-03049-D)
Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roberto Bautista Rivas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roberto Bautista Rivas appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint, construed as a Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Rivas v. GEO Group, Inc., No. 5:06-ct-03049-D
(E.D.N.C. July 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -