Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Compton v. New River Valley Reg Jail, 06-7452 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7452 Visitors: 45
Filed: Jan. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7452 BOBBY L. COMPTON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL; NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL, Medical Department; DONNIE SIMPKINS, Superintendent; JOYCE GIAMPRESSRO, Head Nurse; FREDERICK MOSES, Doctor; J. B. JACKSON, Major, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00241-sgw-mf
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7452 BOBBY L. COMPTON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL; NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL, Medical Department; DONNIE SIMPKINS, Superintendent; JOYCE GIAMPRESSRO, Head Nurse; FREDERICK MOSES, Doctor; J. B. JACKSON, Major, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00241-sgw-mf) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby L. Compton, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bobby L. Compton, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:06-cv-002431-sgw-mf (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer